Which of these is NOT a benefit of cross-sector collaboration?

Cross-sector collaboration typically involves multiple sectors, such as government, business, and nonprofit organizations, working together to tackle complex social, economic, or environmental issues. One of the primary goals of such collaboration is to leverage the diverse strengths and resources of different sectors to achieve a common purpose.

The correct choice highlights that heightened sectoral competition is not a benefit associated with cross-sector collaboration. In fact, collaboration usually aims to reduce competition among sectors by fostering cooperation and sharing resources, knowledge, and expertise. This collective approach can lead to a more integrated effort in addressing challenges, rather than competing against one another, which often leads to inefficiencies and fragmented solutions.

The other options represent genuine benefits of cross-sector collaboration. Improved problem-solving capabilities arise because different sectors bring unique perspectives and expertise to the table, allowing for more comprehensive approaches to challenges. The reduction of duplicated efforts occurs when organizations across sectors share information and resources, preventing multiple entities from trying to tackle the same issue independently. Increased resource accessibility is achieved by pooling resources, knowledge, and networks from various sectors, making it easier for all parties involved to access support and resources that they may not have on their own.